To Stent, or Not to Stent for Carotid Stenosis?
Mon, September 20, 2010 at 02:00AM Carotid stenosis (or narrowing) is due to the presence of increasing atherosclerosis in the carotid artery. It may go unnoticed until the first major effect – a stroke or a transient ischemic attack (TIA, also called a ministroke) occurs, or it may be detected clinically by clinical examination or an ultrasound. Treatment usually involves a combination of lifestyle changes, medications and, in some cases, surgery (endarterectomy, where the arterial plaques are removed) or a stenting procedure. In the latter case, a small wire-mesh coil called a stent is inserted to keep the artery from narrowing. Which type of procedure is the best?
Surgeons involved in 3 randomized trials, agreed to pool their results in a meta-analysis, which they published in the Lancet. There were a total of 3,400 patients who had either endarterectomy or angioplasty (widening of the artery) with stent placement. The end-points assessed were stroke or death; such evaluations were made at 30 days and 120 days after the procedure.
At both time intervals, patients under the age of 70 showed no difference in risk for a combination of any stroke or death), regardless of their treatment. However, in those 70 and older, stenting was associated with a doubling of the risk. The surgeons conclude that their findings show that the harm of stenting compared with endarterectomy is lessened with younger age. They state: “Stenting . . . should be avoided in older patients (age 70 or above), but might be as safe as endarterectomy in younger patients". So the over-70s get a firm recommendation, but younger patients are still left a little uncertain.
Reader Comments